‘Dedicated Cargo’ airlines operate on a very different
business model from that of their passenger counterparts. Outside
of the higher priced ‘integrated’ cargo airlines like
FedEx, UPS and DHL, most freighter operators transport general cargo
with very little pricing power. In this business, it is the freight
forwarder or cargo consolidator who dictates the terms, playing
one airline against the other as the price for offering them consolidated
shipments in bulk. Saddled with huge aircraft investments, general
cargo airlines look for every opportunity to shave costs. In most
cases, they generate revenue on only one leg of their trips, coming
back empty on the return leg. Thus, when non hub airports, located
far from metropolitan cities dangle incentives such as lower landing
fees and ground handling charges, often half that of their mainline
counterparts, the temptation to cut expenses is often too difficult
to resist.
Unlike passengers who need to travel through major passenger hubs,
cargo can quite easily bypass these hubs and land at remote locations.
It is this phenomenon that has allowed defunct and far flung military
bases in Western Europe and North America to re-invent themselves
as cargo airports, thus giving them a new lease of life, and in
the process providing much needed income and employment to their
rural communities.
Cargo aircraft also generally arrive at night. With very few people
living in the vicinity of these rural airports, they can be operated
24 hours a day, seven days a week, with no ban on night traffic
and virtually none of the noise restrictions which have driven cargo
flights away from airports like Brussels, and which imminently threaten
airports like Frankfurt. The fact that they are in the middle of
nowhere allows them to grow exponentially and inexpensively, with
very little legal interference and tremendous local support.
So what do you need to be a ‘cargo friendly’ airport?
For the purpose of this article, we polled four European airports;
Frankfurt Hahn in Germany, Paris Vatry and Chateauroux in France,
and Ostend airport in Belgium. There is a common thread that binds
all of these airports. They all boast runways exceeding 3000 metres,
are all capable of handling the largest freighter types, all have
leading edge flight navigation systems, outstanding infrastructure,
excellent road connections, dedicated cargo and ground handling
capabilities, and most important, significantly lower landing, cargo
handling and warehousing costs at their more rural locations. Since
most of them cater to the perishables trade, including flowers,
fruits and vegetables, they have invested heavily in special cold
storage facilities. With strong political support from their local
governments and plenty of room to grow, they look forward to a bright
future.
However, despite all of this, the numbers for all cargo airports
have not added up. None of them are in the big league in cargo like
their passenger counterparts in Hong Kong, New York or Seoul, where
cargo throughput can easily exceed one million tonnes each year.
Dedicated cargo airports would be lucky to exceed a throughput
of 100,000 tonnes a year, with most operating in the 40-100,000
tonnes per annum range. Their business model is still shaky, and
the entry or departure of even one cargo carrier can make or break
them. Paris Vatry Airport, which clocked 41,203 tonnes of cargo
in 2008, saw this figure drop to 23,000 tonnes in 2009 with the
departure of a major African based airline. While cargo airports
have had notched up some successes with the perishables trade, most
other general cargoes have stayed away. Many survive by leasing
out warehousing space or positioning themselves as logistics hubs,
which have not really generated any significant air cargo traffic.
Others are actually soliciting passenger traffic to stay afloat
and have opened their doors to ‘low cost’ passenger
services.
There is still no overarching template for a traditional cargo
airline to abandon a hub airport in favour of a more rural cargo
airport, notwithstanding lower landing and ground handling fees
and plenty of cheap real estate to grow a business. Conventional
carriers, transporting general cargo, still need to be in airports
where they can benefit from other carriers, using the network to
move cargo, as well as a pool of surface transportation providers
with national connections.
The dilemma for cargo airports is that to attract a commercial
carrier, they need a strong forwarder community. Conversely, to
bring in the forwarder community, you need commercial air service;
the classic chicken and egg scenario. Forwarders, who grew big at
hub airports when all cargo moved in passenger bellies, have already
committed major investments in manpower, warehousing space and equipment
at these gateway airports and are very reluctant to move, even though
more and more cargo now moves on dedicated freighters. Since over
80% of all world air cargo is controlled by the 20 top freight forwarders,
they are the ones that hold the power to unleash the new dynamics
for this business. Unless they are incentivised to move to cargo
airports, this game will never change.
This challenge has many cargo airport executives scratching their
heads for a way to get the first big forwarder to move. One notable
success story is Huntsville, a U.S. airport located in Huntsville,
Alabama, which boasts of regular B747 freighter flights operated
by Atlas Air on behalf of global forwarder Panalpina, as part of
their owner controlled network. However, even though Panalpina has
persevered with this operation at Huntsville, the airport does not
seem to have been successful in attracting any other major forwarders
or cargo operators.
So what will it take to put dedicated cargo airports on the global
map of the air cargo world? We believe that the answer is ‘niche
marketing.’ Since large forwarders are reluctant to move,
cargo airports need to set their sights a little lower and target
smaller forwarders who deal in specialised products that need to
move on special ‘purpose built’ freighter aircraft.
They need to customise all their offerings, including ground handling,
temperature controlled warehousing and airport access, to cater
to these specialised trades.
Rather than adopting a general approach to cargo, they need to
concentrate on specific products and industries and develop ‘core
competencies’ in each of them. They then need to promote branding
and product differentiation to achieve market domination in these
sectors. One such category is pharmaceuticals and life sciences,
which requires major investments in both training and infrastructure
to ensure 100% integrity of the final product. Similarly, we believe
that there are many other products that lend themselves to very
specialised treatment and procedures that cargo airports can become
proficient in.
Cargo airports will thus have to concentrate on quality rather
than quantity till such time as they gain the critical mass to attract
the attention of the large forwarders. The persistence and stamina
that it will take to prove the business case for such airports will
separate the men from the boys. During this time, they must educate
themselves and become proficient in the dynamics and unique characteristics
of each and every type of cargo by attending trade and industry
forums dedicated to them. Specialisation and product differentiation
must become their new mantra. The world must learn that every type
of cargo deserves special treatment, and new benchmarks need to
be developed to cater to each of them.
While all of this happens, more stringent bans on night flying
and tighter security regulations for cargo products will drive more
cargo flights from passenger hubs to dedicated cargo airports. Indeed
as Joerg Schumacher, Managing Director of Frankfurt Hahn Airport
(a cargo airport 75 miles from Frankfurt) observes: “With
the discussion on the ban of night flights at Frankfurt Main in
full swing, international interest in our flight capacities is growing.”
Indeed, history is replete with examples of opportunity being created
out of adversity. While cargo airports work at perfecting their
own game plans, excessive regulation at passenger airports might
become the new tipping point for revival in the fortunes of dedicated
cargo airports. |